Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO vs Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro
Both are Fujifilm X mount primes for macro — here's how the specs differ and which to pick. Every spec is from the manufacturer's own catalog.
| Spec | Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO | Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 65mm | 30mm |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Type | prime | prime |
| Coverage | APS-C | APS-C |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
Which should you buy?
- the Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro (30mm) is wider — more in the frame for street and interiors; the Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO (65mm) is tighter — more reach and compression for portraits
- the Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro is first-party (Fujifilm) for guaranteed full autofocus and in-camera corrections; the Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO is third-party — usually the value pick
Where to buy
Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APOSee price on Amazon
Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR MacroSee price on Amazon
FAQ
What's the difference between the Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO and the Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro?
The Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO is 65mm f/2.8 prime, APS-C; the Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro is 30mm f/2.8 prime, APS-C. Both fit the Fujifilm X mount.
Do the Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO and Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro fit the same camera?
Yes — both are Fujifilm X mount lenses, so they fit Fujifilm X-T/X-H/X-Pro/X-E/X-S series (APS-C).
More Fujifilm X comparisons: Fujifilm XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR vs Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR · Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR vs Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR · Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO vs Fujifilm XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro · Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro vs Fujifilm XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro · all Fujifilm X lenses · all comparisons