Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF vs Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO
Both are Sony E mount primes for low-light and standard prime — here's how the specs differ and which to pick. Every spec is from the manufacturer's own catalog.
| Spec | Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF | Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 35mm | 55mm |
| Max aperture | f/0.95 | f/1.8 |
| Type | prime | prime |
| Coverage | full-frame | full-frame |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Which should you buy?
- the Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF opens wider (f/0.95) — brighter in low light and more background blur
- the Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF (35mm) is wider — more in the frame for street and interiors; the Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO (55mm) is tighter — more reach and compression for portraits
Where to buy
Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FFSee price on Amazon
Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVOSee price on Amazon
FAQ
What's the difference between the Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF and the Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO?
The Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF is 35mm f/0.95 prime, full-frame; the Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO is 55mm f/1.8 prime, full-frame. Both fit the Sony E mount.
Which is better in low light, the Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF or the Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO?
The Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF — its f/0.95 maximum aperture lets in more light and gives more background blur than the f/1.8 of the other.
Do the Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF and Viltrox AF 55mm f/1.8 EVO fit the same camera?
Yes — both are Sony E mount lenses, so they fit Sony a7/a9/a1 (full-frame) and a6000-series (APS-C).
More Sony E comparisons: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art vs Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II · Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II vs Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD · Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF vs Samyang AF 35mm f/1.4 P FE · Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f/1.2 E vs Samyang AF 35mm f/1.4 P FE · all Sony E lenses · all comparisons