Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 vs Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO
Both are Fujifilm X mount primes for portrait and budget — here's how the specs differ and which to pick. Every spec is from the manufacturer's own catalog.
| Spec | Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 | Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 33mm | 90mm |
| Max aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.2 |
| Type | prime | prime |
| Coverage | APS-C | APS-C |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
Which should you buy?
- the Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 opens wider (f/1.4) — brighter in low light and more background blur
- the Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 (33mm) is wider — more in the frame for street and interiors; the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO (90mm) is tighter — more reach and compression for portraits
Where to buy
Meike AF 33mm f/1.4See price on Amazon
Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVOSee price on Amazon
FAQ
What's the difference between the Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO?
The Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 is 33mm f/1.4 prime, APS-C; the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO is 90mm f/2.2 prime, APS-C. Both fit the Fujifilm X mount.
Which is better in low light, the Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 or the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO?
The Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 — its f/1.4 maximum aperture lets in more light and gives more background blur than the f/2.2 of the other.
Do the Meike AF 33mm f/1.4 and Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO fit the same camera?
Yes — both are Fujifilm X mount lenses, so they fit Fujifilm X-T/X-H/X-Pro/X-E/X-S series (APS-C).
More Fujifilm X comparisons: Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD vs Fujifilm XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ · Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR vs Fujifilm XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ · Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR vs TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8 X · Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR vs Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro · all Fujifilm X lenses · all comparisons